I dunno, if feels like an invitation to attach contextual meaning to a selection of random phrases.
You could present this as a list of things ${profession} should know, and somebody somewhere would find it a refreshing thought experiment.
I would question if those mental gymnastics reflect on the source, or on the individual who created the meaning?
Without context its just a list of stuff with indeterminate intent - any artistry is the result of the reader willing it into existence.
Re:Things an architect should know
by galfarragem on Tuesday October 23, 2018 @12:46PM
(#18285028)
Believe or not, this fits very well as the informal curriculum of my Masters degree in Architecture and is not random at all.
It may not be _genius_, but I don't think it's stupid, and especially not because it's an artistic rather than practical guide.