Re:Blood money
by notyourday on Monday October 22, 2018 @05:10PM
(#18278555)
I'm having a hard time figuring out what kind of olympic level mental gymnastics I need to engage in to be able to view a butchering of a US permanent resident who works for a major US newspaper in a consulate on a territory of a NATO country and lying about it being a "progress" but I'm probably just not understanding the delicate picture
Re:Blood money
by mattmcknight on Tuesday October 23, 2018 @12:47PM
(#18285036)
I was referencing the broader program of social change Mohammed bin Salman has begun to enact (driving, concerts, movie theaters, women working, anti-corruption), as contrasted to the more regressive opinions of his predecessors any likely successors.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-women-drivers-face-one-la...
Re:Blood money
by notyourday on Tuesday October 23, 2018 @01:11PM
(#18285263)
So in this case the end justifies the means, right?
Why would it lose stability and fall apart? Saudi Arabia is about as stable as bad places come, which is what makes it is so terrible. This is exactly the sort of country you should pressure to reform. Otherwise might as well just come out and say that it was all just an excuse to freely meddle with countries we don't like.
Re:Blood money
by mattmcknight on Tuesday October 23, 2018 @12:47PM
(#18285043)
I don't think it would, but that is what the parent comment suggested.
Instead, we see a slow progress which is painful, but may be the best that can be hoped for.