In the old days, in some countries, we had a device for changing the government when it did stuff you didn't want to be complicit in. I think they called it an "election" ;-). Now, admittedly, even if I take a very broad array of American political parties, from the Greens to the Libertarians, their spectrum on foreign policy still ranges from bloody-stupid to fucking appalling, so I don't entirely blame actively anti-war Americans for the anti-war movement's failure to stop the war.
But that's because the democratic system has decayed to the point where, if you don't want today's fresh new war of choice, you're left choosing between two irrelevant third parties, one of whom puts forth a candidate who doesn't know where Aleppo is, and the other of whom are outright tankies on foreign policy and may be paid by Vladimir Putin.
#MakeHNTechnicalAgain
Does Saudi Arabia have centuries of free enterprise, civil rights progress, government accountability, and not-a-monarchy?
> Corporate charters are granted by governments, from the people.
This is true for the USA, at least afaict as an European.
The same can't be said about Saudi Arabia, as sad as that might be.