News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Kodak Died and Fujifilm Thrived: A Tale of Two Film C... by ghaff on Sunday October 21, 2018 @07:58PM (#18271113)
That's one view. I honestly never understood the attraction of Velvia 50. I know it was beloved of people who were better photographers than I.But I'd use Kodachrome 25 (which had a similar effective film speed) any day.The greens and blues of Velvia always seemed fake.

In any case, both of those were niche films for pros and a few prosumers.

Re:Why Kodak Died and Fujifilm Thrived: A Tale of Two Film C... by gmiller123456 on Monday October 22, 2018 @03:10PM (#18277391)
My, and most photographers I knew, reason for choosing Velvia was that you could develop it yourself. Kodachrome could only be developed by Kodak, but from what I've read about it, it was far superior in every other technical aspect. But not being able to control the push/pull of the development process really limited creative control over the whole process and was a more severe limitation than the higher resolution and color depth that Kodachrome provided.

The way I saw it, Kodachrome was more for consumers who just wanted to press a button and have it done. And Fujichrome was for people who took the process much more serious. Because they could do more with the "inferior" product than relying on the one-size-fits-all commercial process.

Re:Why Kodak Died and Fujifilm Thrived: A Tale of Two Film C... by melloclello on Sunday October 21, 2018 @09:26PM (#18271473)
Velvia makes people look far too red in the face.
Re:Why Kodak Died and Fujifilm Thrived: A Tale of Two Film C... by aaronbrethorst on Sunday October 21, 2018 @11:17PM (#18271946)
You should use Provia for portraits, not Velvia. Velvia, as you note, has a strong magenta cast.