News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Understanding Quaternions by KboPAacDA3 on Saturday October 20, 2018 @10:01PM (#18266422)
And why do descriptions of quaternions include a rigorous proof? I trust quaternions work, so skip the proof and show me how to use them in a practical, efficient way.
Re:Understanding Quaternions by joppy on Sunday October 21, 2018 @03:26AM (#18267067)
The fact that the quaternions “work” (are a finite-dimensional real vector space with an associative real-bilinear multiplication, and a division operation) is quite special. In fact there are only three objects satisfying this criteria: the real numbers themselves, the complex numbers, and the quaternions.
Re:Understanding Quaternions by j1vms on Sunday October 21, 2018 @10:32AM (#18268120)
> there are only three objects satisfying this criteria: the real numbers themselves, the complex numbers, and the quaternions.

Does a proof exist that these are the only three of such objects?

Re:Understanding Quaternions by joppy on Sunday October 21, 2018 @10:52AM (#18268233)
Yes, and the proof only uses linear algebra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_theorem_(real_divisi...
Re:Understanding Quaternions by j1vms on Sunday October 21, 2018 @01:31PM (#18269040)
Thanks. Great result, surprising for 1877.
Re:Understanding Quaternions by umanwizard on Saturday October 20, 2018 @10:25PM (#18266466)
In mathematics often proofs lead to understanding why something works (on the other hand, many proofs aren’t written in a way that make the main ideas clear or easy to tease out from details)