If someone learned French to read about Lagrange multipliers from Lagrange's original papers, then they would be sorely disappointed: it was actually Euler who first used the Lagrange method! (And by some curious coincidence, the L/lambda could just as easily be a homage to Leonhard as to Lagrange...)
Don't they say that mathematical concepts from Eulers era are named after the second person to use them?
Re:Understanding Quaternions
by salty_biscuits on Sunday October 21, 2018 @04:26AM
(#18267161)
That is true too. But it's slightly different from the case of Euler who just invented so many things.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_L...
Re:Understanding Quaternions
by ModernMech on Saturday October 20, 2018 @07:25PM
(#18266003)
> Nobody is going to learn French in order to read about Lagrange multipliers from Lagrange's original papers.
You'd think, but I had a professor in physics who learned German just so he could read Boltzmann's original works.
It used to be common in hard sciences and mathematics for English-speaking doctoral candidates to be required to show some aptitude for German or Russian. Maybe still is, dunno.
It’s definitely not
I believe German was required in order to study Chemistry back in the day.
Re:Understanding Quaternions
by hprotagonist on Saturday October 20, 2018 @10:40PM
(#18266492)
it had to be. The bulk of the literature wasn’t in english.
it is now..but it’s still good to know for reviewing the older work.
Re:Understanding Quaternions
by paulgrant999 on Sunday October 21, 2018 @09:49PM
(#18271574)
in fact this is the primary reasons why I want to learn French, Russian, German ;)
reading the masters, is never a waste.
But for quaternions, it was easy: I actually cited the Brougham Bridge inscription. One cannot, of course, check the bridge out of the engineering library to check the citation, but clearly this was the original “publication” of quaternion multiplication.
My advisor finally got the point.