News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape by andybak on Thursday October 18, 2018 @09:34AM (#18248154)
In case this scares any new users, I've used nothing more than pip and virtualenv for several years with no issues of note.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape by peterkelly on Thursday October 18, 2018 @12:15PM (#18249550)
Seconded. I read this article and thought "nope, not touching any of those tools". I'd rather spend my time building products than spending a week researching the landscape of 10 different package management approaches.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape by SSilver2k2 on Thursday October 18, 2018 @02:21PM (#18250751)
Same. pip + virtualenv just works.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape by philosopherlawr on Thursday October 18, 2018 @11:57AM (#18249384)
There are lots of errors when it comes to reproducing the build on other machines. Pip install -r requirements.txt does not guarantee that you will install the same version of packages on a new machine, and in fact, you will typically not.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape by jabwork on Thursday October 18, 2018 @01:37PM (#18250350)
I've never had problems with this when requirements.txt contains package versions

Have you, or are you not using explicit versions supplied by eg pip freeze?

Re:Python's New Package Landscape by wepower_ico on Thursday October 18, 2018 @10:44AM (#18248701)
Totally agree. And why not just invest time into pip than invent again.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape by linuxftw on Thursday October 18, 2018 @10:14AM (#18248463)
Same. I feel people invent problems in order to not use these tools.