Re:Python's New Package Landscape
by andybak on Thursday October 18, 2018 @09:34AM
(#18248154)
In case this scares any new users, I've used nothing more than pip and virtualenv for several years with no issues of note.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Python's New Package Landscape
by peterkelly on Thursday October 18, 2018 @12:15PM
(#18249550)
Seconded. I read this article and thought "nope, not touching any of those tools". I'd rather spend my time building products than spending a week researching the landscape of 10 different package management approaches.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape
by SSilver2k2 on Thursday October 18, 2018 @02:21PM
(#18250751)
Same. pip + virtualenv just works.
Re:Python's New Package Landscape
by philosopherlawr on Thursday October 18, 2018 @11:57AM
(#18249384)
There are lots of errors when it comes to reproducing the build on other machines. Pip install -r requirements.txt does not guarantee that you will install the same version of packages on a new machine, and in fact, you will typically not.
I've never had problems with this when requirements.txt contains package versions
Have you, or are you not using explicit versions supplied by eg pip freeze?
Re:Python's New Package Landscape
by wepower_ico on Thursday October 18, 2018 @10:44AM
(#18248701)
Totally agree. And why not just invest time into pip than invent again.