Re:Helm: Personal Email Server
by iancarroll on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @01:50PM
(#18241567)
From the technical specs, it's almost certainly the i.MX 8, which as far as I know is not affected or listed on any of the errata for that vulnerability.
I missed the part on the tech page that listed the A72, so yeah it's an iMX8.
Hopefully the HAB fix is the reason for the 8. Otherwise this seems like overkill for the work involved.
Re:Helm: Personal Email Server
by gsreenivas on Thursday October 18, 2018 @05:48PM
(#18252448)
Good guess and we looked at the i.MX but did not select that line of SoCs. We are using the Layerscape line of SoCs from NXP
Okay, so that narrows it down to the i.MX family.
We chose this to ensure that the device can only run signed, trusted code by implementing secure boot and signature verification of software updates.
Maybe read this?
https://blog.quarkslab.com/vulnerabilities-in-high-assurance...