Re:Donald Daters, a dating app for Trump supporters, leaked ...
by bentona on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @06:28PM
(#18233847)
Telling the operators first creates a situation where there is a reasonable chance that no one malicious will obtain the data. Publishing a public blog post greatly increases the chance the entire dataset will be leaked to the public.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Donald Daters, a dating app for Trump supporters, leaked ...
by kevinmchugh on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @08:51AM
(#18238436)
The researcher can only change the likelihood the data isn't obtained by a malicious actor if a malicious actor hasn't already obtained the data. The researcher usually has no way of telling if a malicious actor has the data. Optimizing for the worst-case scenario, which is yes, a black-hat hacker has already gotten there, it makes sense to prioritize notification of users by all available means so they can attempt to remediate the data loss.
Re:Donald Daters, a dating app for Trump supporters, leaked ...
by jshowa1 on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @08:18AM
(#18238219)
Nearly all security vulnerabilities are published in blog posts at some point because most companies deny a problem even exists or needs to be fixed. Sometimes they just don't even respond and the person who discovered the vulnerability publishes anyways as a sort of "punishment" for the companies lack of response.