Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by juskrey on Sunday October 14, 2018 @06:29AM
(#18212248)
"Selfish gene" notion was debunked by Novak et al. Also Taleb extensively writes in his books about how this contradicts evolution.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by nabla9 on Sunday October 14, 2018 @08:30AM
(#18212576)
The Novak et al. paper was heavily rebutted.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2011/03/researchers-challeng...
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by throwaway837914 on Sunday October 14, 2018 @01:07PM
(#18213870)
The nature paper is not a rebuttal, it just says "hey look we did some studies, didn't they read those studies? We studied lots of things and came to conclusions."
There's no modeling of the Wilson argument that is then proven to be wrong.
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by FabHK on Sunday October 14, 2018 @06:38AM
(#18212274)
I wouldn't give much stock in what Taleb writes about anything except options trading.
Can you give a more specific reference to Novak et al.? I don't think the "Selfish Gene" has been "debunked", and find no reference to Novak eg at Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene-centered_view_of_evolutio...
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by oceanofsolaris on Sunday October 14, 2018 @06:48AM
(#18212303)
I think this refers to Nowak et al and I assume refers to the discussion mentioned in the Wikipedia article of the book (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene#Units_of_sele...).
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by holowire on Sunday October 14, 2018 @08:12AM
(#18212532)
> I wouldn't give much stock in what Taleb writes about anything except options trading.
Why do you say that? I’m broadly familiar with Taleb’s writing, but have yet to fully read any of his books. So I’m curious of your perspective here and what is informing that sentiment.
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by tptacek on Sunday October 14, 2018 @12:08PM
(#18213548)
He's a gadfly, not a scientist writing to popularize a field he actually does work in. (With the plausible exception of options trading).
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by AceyMan on Sunday October 14, 2018 @02:03PM
(#18214169)
Whether he's truly a gladly or not, you have to appreciate a guy who's self-aware enough about such opinions that he listed this quip first on the back cover of his latest book (from memory, mind you) —
>The trouble with Taleb isn't that he's an asshole—he is an asshole. The trouble with Taleb is that he is right.
Love that!
Re:Spreadsheet of Steven Pinker’s book recommendations
by claytoneast on Sunday October 14, 2018 @01:07PM
(#18213873)
Do you think his central thesises around Black Swan events, tail risks, hedging, and skin-in-the-game principle for evaluating advice/statements, are not relevant to scopes beyond options trading?
Note, I am not stating he is not a gadfly. He is, absolutely. But is he wrong?