Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by gcb0 on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @10:30AM
(#18176248)
intel is failing benchmarks, security vulns all around. Nvidia is failing to deliver price/perf they promised years ago. amd is the opposite of both and it's stock continues to dive. go figure.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by swarnie_ on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @11:03AM
(#18176486)
> amd is the opposite of both and it's stock continues to dive. go figure.
AMDs share price is up almost 1400% in 2 years, what on earth are you on about?
Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by SteveNuts on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @11:27AM
(#18176698)
It's currently on a bit of a slump after some financial firms lowered their targets of the stock price.
I have a feeling it'll make its way back up though.
Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by swarnie_ on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @11:36AM
(#18176800)
I think when you outpace the general index by multiple factors over years a small pull back is not only expected, its healthy.
Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by gcb0 on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @12:46PM
(#18177515)
exactly. it jumped from bankruptcy level ($1.5) to bottom of peers ($20) in august! since then it had a peak in sept and is on freefall again, while it should have been rising faster.
Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by ghaff on Tuesday October 09, 2018 @10:40AM
(#18176316)
Stock performance is about a lot more than individual product technical specs. That said, I see AMD is down a bit recently but it's had a significant run-up the past 6 months (~2X) and even more over the past couple of years after being basically flat for ages. And it's got quite a high PE (58) which tends to make stocks vulnerable to even middling news. (By contrast, Intel's PE is about 17.)