News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The benefits and costs of writing a POSIX kernel in a hig... by yoklov on Monday October 08, 2018 @11:54PM (#18173205)
IIRC https://cyclone.thelanguage.org/ did this (among other things -- I think it's also where Rust lifetimes began their, err, life) and ended up having rather poor performance for pointer-manipulation heavy code.

I don't know if things would be better now with more optimizing compilers, but I remember being somewhat surprised by this at the time, since you'd expect most of the overhead from passing fat pointers around to get optimized away.

Re:The benefits and costs of writing a POSIX kernel in a hig... by kartickv on Wednesday October 10, 2018 @03:09AM (#18182639)
Did Cyclone let you turn off bounds-checking in performance-critical code, as I suggested?