Re:Model 3 achieves the lowest probability of injury of any ...
by dsfyu404ed on Monday October 08, 2018 @09:50AM
(#18167399)
Safety doesn't scale (well it does, but it scales linearly, meaning it doesn't get much cheaper at scale). It might cost Tesla a grand or two per car for all the metal they throw at the safety problem. That's less than a quarter million per quarter for them. Trimming that fat looks a lot more attractive to a company like GM that's shipping a quarter million cars per quarter because not over building things is a multi-million quarterly savings for them
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Model 3 achieves the lowest probability of injury of any ...
by ma2rten on Monday October 08, 2018 @10:41AM
(#18167872)
You need to compare against cars in the same price class.
Re:Model 3 achieves the lowest probability of injury of any ...
by dsfyu404ed on Monday October 08, 2018 @11:03AM
(#18168084)
The vehicles in higher price classes are built on the same platforms as their mass-market counterparts. An Audi is just a VW and a Cadillac is a GM. Adding reinforcement to the luxury version of a car but not the mass-market version is a PR mess waiting to happen so nobody in their right mind will do it.
Re:Model 3 achieves the lowest probability of injury of any ...
by hef19898 on Monday October 08, 2018 @11:28AM
(#18168303)
Size of the car, not brand. Sure an Audi A3 is disguised Golf, a VW Passat is disguised Audi A4. So the correcr comparison is Golf vs. A3 vs. similar sized car. You don't compare a VW Tuareg against a VW Polo for that very reason.