Re:Poll: Would you prefer no copyright to current copyright ...
by twblalock on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:10PM
(#18157565)
I don’t see how I violate copyright law in my daily life. It’s not like I acidentally pirate movies.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Poll: Would you prefer no copyright to current copyright ...
by cameronhowe on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:16PM
(#18157586)
Pirating movies is not the only way to violate copyright law.
Taking photos of things without the correct permissions (freedom of panorama) sharing copyright protected things on social media
I don't know anyone who doesn't violate some aspect of the law.
Re:Poll: Would you prefer no copyright to current copyright ...
by unstuckdev on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:30PM
(#18157657)
Has anyone ever been successfully sued or fined over an IP-protected object in a shot where that object wasn't the focus?
Re:Poll: Would you prefer no copyright to current copyright ...
by cameronhowe on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:47PM
(#18157754)
So first off, your question is irrelevant to my original question. I asked specifically if something is never enforced why should it be a law. None of the replies to my question has even addressed that :(
Secondly, that is not what freedom of panorama means, it means you are allowed to take pictures of anything in the public space. See: https://expertphotography.com/freedom-of-panorama-photograph...
Thirdly, wikipedia has examples of litigations.
Fourthly, IP is not copyright. If you took a selfie with some top secret tech you signed an NDA not to reveal was in there you will probably get in big trouble
\/ yes probably
Re:Poll: Would you prefer no copyright to current copyright ...
by unstuckdev on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:50PM
(#18157767)
>> "None of the replies to my question has even addressed that"
That's always a good sign the question wasn't clear.