Re:The iPhone XS and XS Max Review: Unveiling the Silicon Se...
by pertymcpert on Friday October 05, 2018 @11:48AM
(#18149067)
People aren't comparing 3W mobile chips to 150W desktop CPUs. They're comparing like for like in terms of perf/watt. Skylake isn't a particular SKU, it's a micoarchitecture generation, from which Intel can scale the design from low power 10W parts to power hungry server chips.
Re:The iPhone XS and XS Max Review: Unveiling the Silicon Se...
by aquadrop on Friday October 05, 2018 @12:15PM
(#18149310)
Article reference specific CPU - Xeon 8176. It has 165W TDP.
Re:The iPhone XS and XS Max Review: Unveiling the Silicon Se...
by wintercharm on Friday October 05, 2018 @07:06PM
(#18152456)
SpecInt/FP is comparing Single core IPC between one A12 BIG core, and one Skylake server CPU core.
Per-core power consumption on that Intel chip is 165W/28cores = 5.89W
Apple is pushing similar IPC at 3W instead of 5.89W. In that context, it's not so unbelievable, and it's still really fucking impressive.
Re:The iPhone XS and XS Max Review: Unveiling the Silicon Se...
by aquadrop on Saturday October 06, 2018 @06:07AM
(#18154374)
Yeah, I know, I wrote about it in my original comment, you didn't have to tell me that twice :)
And that's my point, Apple already has very impressive thing going on, no need to smudge it with sensationalists statements.
But it's not the point, main point is that I think statement that current A12 is close (to whatever reasonable %) to top desktop chips is simply not true. I didn't see any concrete evidence of it, and everyone just seem to like this idea, that's why it was talked much lately. I'm all for great advantages and all that, but I still must use common sense, 3-4W vs 150+ W - that's too much.