News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple by matchagaucho on Friday October 05, 2018 @03:33AM (#18146380)
"before servers are put into production at Apple they are inspected for security vulnerabilities"

A chip smaller than a grain of rice nested between motherboard layers.

What tools could detect such a chip?

While I don't doubt Apple inspects, the zero-day threat always exists.

Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple by baybal2 on Friday October 05, 2018 @06:08AM (#18146941)
Xray inspection by a human specialist
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple by sterlind on Friday October 05, 2018 @06:22AM (#18146994)
Further in the article, Bloomberg mentions a chip, smaller than a pencil tip, sandwiched inside the PCB itself, under other traces. That seems bananas difficult to pull off, but could x-ray inspection find such a thing if it existed?
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple by minxomat on Friday October 05, 2018 @07:02AM (#18147139)
Yes, because the incident they reference was a mid-PCB-layer chip discovered by govt agencies using X-rays. The findings were presented at a private conference in Virginia. Sources who attended said "they've seen the xray pictures" etc.
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple by baybal2 on Friday October 05, 2018 @06:51AM (#18147101)
I specifically mention non-automatic inspection as automatic one may well not have the "paranoid mode," unlike a human who specifically told to go over every individual square millimetre.
Re:What Businessweek got wrong about Apple by matchagaucho on Friday October 05, 2018 @09:16AM (#18147828)
Minimum quantity orders for these servers are typically 10,000.

Even at 1,000, I don't see how humans could reliably detect this.