Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by wepple on Thursday October 04, 2018 @09:18AM
(#18139590)
> Modern ASICs are so complex that I'm sure that sneaking a tiny backdoor into the behemoth that's a modern CPU or embedded SoC would be almost trivial.
I suspect putting in a backdoor would be difficult because they are complex. Wouldn’t it be far too easy for the backdoor to inadvertently cause reliability or performance issues? And the bug would have to be useful enough to warrant potentially destroying the semiconductor business of a nation, not just some difficult to trigger side channel.
[dead]
Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by dang on Sunday October 07, 2018 @05:00AM
(#18159577)
Please be civil here.
Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by wepple on Friday October 05, 2018 @07:16AM
(#18147192)
Welcome to HN. You’ll find that kind of negative comment which doesn’t really add to the discussion isn’t valued here.
It wasn’t wild nor uneducated; I have some experience with FPGAs and the challenges of complex circuit design - regardless, I was posing a question rather than stating fact.
Do you disagree with what I suggested? Educate me, correct my speculation.
Modern ASICs are so complex that I'm sure that sneaking a tiny backdoor into the behemoth that's a modern CPU or embedded SoC would be almost trivial. They'd also have great plausible deniability in case they're found, if something like SPECTRE was an intentional backdoor how would you ever prove it for instance?