Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by Narkov on Thursday October 04, 2018 @05:56AM
(#18138478)
Firewalls in high security environments aren't just port/protocol based. You lock everything down - source ip/port and destination ip/port. You should know where it is coming from and where it is going to.
Navy ships don't upload via Dropbox.
Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by bni on Thursday October 04, 2018 @11:07AM
(#18140554)
Certainly true, since Dropbox doesn't work on Windows XP anymore.
Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by RL_Quine on Thursday October 04, 2018 @06:01AM
(#18138499)
In the parent I described a system which would be able to communicate through those restrictions to another compromised host (remember we're assuming everything is compromised for the sake of this article, which actually seems like a good assumption now).
Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by FooHentai on Thursday October 04, 2018 @06:48AM
(#18138709)
Networks where security is taken seriously implement data diodes, and this attack vector is mitigated.
Re:The Big Hack: How China Used a Tiny Chip to Infiltrate Am...
by HillaryBriss on Thursday October 04, 2018 @11:24AM
(#18140731)
> remember we're assuming everything is compromised
I think Bloomberg (and all related) web servers displaying the article are compromised and they're leaving out critical facts the point the finger elsewhere.
A method that wouldn't show up on any firewall in the world is simply to delay or drop certain SYN packets. Even if you only intended to transmit a bit at a time through this, any unauthenticated host on the internet could use this without raising any suspicion or even printing log lines in most environments. As soon are you're making an assumption that you're trying to prevent what's inside from getting out things become substantially closer to impossible than anybody would like.