Re:Donna Strickland won her Nobel prize in Physics before sh...
by wil_wheat_on on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @01:09PM
(#18123565)
the other two winners, male, had pages https://twitter.com/clancynewyork/status/1047098079097380864, there's a broader argument about bias here
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Donna Strickland won her Nobel prize in Physics before sh...
by yorwba on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @01:38PM
(#18123857)
I think the strongest bias in this case is favoring advisors over the students who do the work, even if they get first authorship.
For example, the Alex of AlexNet [1] fame would be Alex Krizhevsky, if he were actually famous. He doesn't have a Wikipedia page, but his advisor Geoffrey Hinton does (and is famous for the AlexNet breakthrough).
Re:Donna Strickland won her Nobel prize in Physics before sh...
by booleandilemma on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @01:39PM
(#18123864)
How can an encyclopedia that anyone can edit be biased?
Anyone could have added her page, no one did, until now.
Re:Donna Strickland won her Nobel prize in Physics before sh...
by cpeterso on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @02:00PM
(#18124078)
Someone created a wiki page for her back in May, but it was deleted because a Wikipedia editor decided she wasn't "notable". Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but it still has the bias of the most recent editor.
https://twitter.com/resolvingdust/status/1047135142978801664
Re:Donna Strickland won her Nobel prize in Physics before sh...
by tda on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @02:08PM
(#18124156)
Actually she had a page, but it was deleted. And then someone recreated the page, and it was rejected in review. QED
Re:Donna Strickland won her Nobel prize in Physics before sh...
by dbcooper71 on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @02:08PM
(#18124152)
The editors didn’t think she was notable enough. This is an editing problem not a submission problem.