Re:More than 9M broken links on Wikipedia are now rescued
by sekh60 on Monday October 01, 2018 @07:23PM
(#18117636)
That doesn't account for redundancy and backups. I have asked some storage cost questions on /r/sysadmin and /r/datahoarder in the past about cost per TB and I tend to see numbers ranging from $300 to $1000 a TB of useable space.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:More than 9M broken links on Wikipedia are now rescued
by dlubarov on Monday October 01, 2018 @08:10PM
(#18117843)
That must be for SSDs, which are ~$150/tb vs ~$20/tb for HDDs. I expect IA must use HDDs for the bulk of their data.
Re:More than 9M broken links on Wikipedia are now rescued
by lordlimecat on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @09:43AM
(#18121533)
SSDs are about $400/TB for raw storage. Prices are substantially different for consumer and enterprise spaces, but 4TB disks (Micron, Samsung, etc) tend to be about $1500 and 8TB around $3200. If you factor in redundancy, you're looking at around $1000-1500 per TB of usable storage.
This also isn't a matter of "just go with cheaper consumer disks". If you care at all about data integrity you won't use consumer-grade SSDs.
Re:More than 9M broken links on Wikipedia are now rescued
by nomel on Monday October 01, 2018 @08:20PM
(#18117879)
Or even tape. For offline redundancy it’s still cheaper.
Re:More than 9M broken links on Wikipedia are now rescued
by lordlimecat on Tuesday October 02, 2018 @09:40AM
(#18121517)
3-way mirrored spinning storage would cost roughly $100/TB. 12TB disks are about $350/ piece these days. There are a whole bunch of possible considerations and alternate scenarios, but this is probably the worst-case.
That does not factor in compression / dedup, which can gain you a substantial amount of savings depending on your work profile; I bet if Archive.org wanted to, they could slash their storage using block-level dedup. Of course that creates potential recoverability headaches, so it's possible they don't.