Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by maxxxxx on Sunday September 30, 2018 @06:19PM
(#18108743)
The fact that this administration is trying to roll back a lot of environmental policies is my number one concern. Environmental regulation has been such a huge success story over the least decades. It's just insane to roll this back.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by hunterjumper06 on Sunday September 30, 2018 @10:28PM
(#18109618)
Regulations have worked too well that people have forgotten just how bad the US was. The GOP’s anti-regulation campaign has been successful in getting the public to go against their own self-interest.
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by maxxxxx on Monday October 01, 2018 @02:19PM
(#18115335)
This also happens to systems administrators. If the network works well you get asked what you are doing the whole day since everything works fine. Time to cut support staff.
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by godzillabrennus on Sunday September 30, 2018 @07:09PM
(#18108979)
Depends on how you measure success.
If you care about the environment it’s a success.
If you care about creating jobs for blue collar workers regardless of how it impacts the environment then it was a relative failure.
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by fzeroracer on Sunday September 30, 2018 @07:14PM
(#18109001)
Putting it into a binary 'environment/jobs' is one of the more silly ways of attempting to measure the success of these regulations.
Did mandating the removal of lead from gasoline affect businesses? Probably. But I imagine no one here would defend the use of leaded gasoline now knowing about the possible links between lead and crime. We should absolutely care about the environment because as it turns out, the environment affects the people and in turns affects our society.
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by craftyguy on Sunday September 30, 2018 @11:44PM
(#18109898)
That's an argument straight from the 1960s-1970s. Creating jobs 'at all costs' is definitely not the answer and should not even be an option.
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by Rizz on Monday October 01, 2018 @02:51AM
(#18110488)
What would create more jobs, running the same old coal power plant a couple more years or building a million new wind turbines? Or running the same old coal power plant or inventing, building and installing new filters and furnaces for existing plants? With the added benefit of having a great new technology to export and sell overseas if you're the world's first to have it (=require it)
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by maxxxxx on Monday October 01, 2018 @12:44PM
(#18114350)
Exactly. Maybe some companies would have higher cost but that money would flow to other companies making that equipment. In the end it may be a net positive.
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by maxxxxx on Sunday September 30, 2018 @07:13PM
(#18108996)
How do you know that environmental regulation actually cost blue collar jobs? They always say that but what is based on?
Re:EPA prepares weakening of mercury regulations
by craftyguy on Sunday September 30, 2018 @11:46PM
(#18109906)
>They always say that but what is based on?
Rhetoric from the current administration and 'news' agencies.