The dangerous myth still believed about the Lehman Brothers bust

Re:The dangerous myth still believed about the Lehman Brothe... by gbacon on Saturday September 29, 2018 @09:44AM (#18100266)

It has been said that Americans speak the language of Jefferson but live in the system that Hamilton advocated.

Likewise, Greenspan while at the Fed may have occasionally mouthed vaguely Objectivist sentiments that echoed his earlier association with Rand, but he was, after all, head of a quasigovernmental body that creates money out of thin air. By this point in his life, Greenspan’s ideology was living it up as a member of the D.C. elite.

To see him advocating laissez-faire, read his essay “Gold and Economic Freedom”[0] — that comes off nothing like Chairman Greenspan.

[0]: https://www.constitution.org/mon/greenspan_gold.txt

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The dangerous myth still believed about the Lehman Brothe... by Nokinside on Saturday September 29, 2018 @10:01AM (#18100365)

Objectivists were not uniformly against fractional reserve banking.

At least objectivists had the idea that laissez-faire benefits the few "the new elite", those who deserve and did not have the weird idea that laissez-faire lifts all up.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The dangerous myth still believed about the Lehman Brothe... by gbacon on Saturday September 29, 2018 @01:48PM (#18101715)

There is a difference in kind between fractional-reserve banking and propping up an entire system of banks with a central bank deemed the lender of last resort and that has the special privilege of issuing newly created fiat money and credit.

I’m no Objectivist, so what do you mean by “the weird idea that laissez-fairy lifts all up”?

[ Parent | on HN ]