News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by drb91 on Friday September 28, 2018 @05:31PM (#18097222)
> Instead perhaps people could suggest a better language/framework that is more productive than Rails, and has had a long lifespan in a large codebase?

I’d suggest most frameworks are better than rails for long lifespans. They just frontloaded productivity, and it shows. The UI and functionality of github is largely the same as in 2010.

Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by bitexploder on Friday September 28, 2018 @05:38PM (#18097277)
GitLab is mostly rails and they have been iterating their UI pretty heavily. I think programming languages are just tools and the team(s) wielding them matter a lot more than the language.
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by int_19h on Friday September 28, 2018 @06:08PM (#18097454)
On the UI, I'm kinda feeling like it's not a bad thing. GitHub UI works. It's neat, most things that need to be done often are easy to find, and otherwise it gets out of my way nicely. Oh, and it doesn't break my browser (links, Back button etc). Why change it?
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by 51 on Friday September 28, 2018 @06:20PM (#18097534)
Bitbucket and Jira use React and are far less usable
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by drb91 on Friday September 28, 2018 @06:17PM (#18097508)
Well, their PR software could use some serious love. I don’t use github for much else.
Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by maxerickson on Friday September 28, 2018 @06:30PM (#18097600)
Are you sure you remember how everything worked in 2010?

And then stuff that was sensible then probably shouldn't have changed much.

Re:Upgrading GitHub from Rails 3.2 to 5.2 by vvillena on Friday September 28, 2018 @05:57PM (#18097396)
Meanwhile, they were able to win market rate so fast that it took a while for competitors to show up.