Re:Facebook blocks sharing of critical Guardian article
by tmalsburg2 on Friday September 28, 2018 @04:51PM
(#18096968)
A spam-detection algorithm that doesn't whitelist pages like The Guardian? I have to say I find it hard to believe that they would be so incompetent.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook blocks sharing of critical Guardian article
by threeseed on Friday September 28, 2018 @05:09PM
(#18097085)
Facebook can't be seen to be prioritising one news source over another.
So I can't imagine they have lists of any news sources and rely entirely on user signals to determine the quality of a source.
Re:Facebook blocks sharing of critical Guardian article
by _cereal on Friday September 28, 2018 @05:47PM
(#18097323)
I second that.
An example: a few weeks ago I shared on my FB profile the Mozilla Foundation petition link for the EU copyright reform[1] and it was removed with this motivation:
"We removed this post because it looks like spam and doesn't follow our Community Standards."
[1] https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2018/09/07/eu-copyright-r...
Re:Facebook blocks sharing of critical Guardian article
by debt on Friday September 28, 2018 @07:50PM
(#18097904)
A whitelist? Huh? What is this the 90's?
I'm pretty sure the algorithms use something more intelligent than a whitelist. A whitelist would be a major loophole in a spam algorithm.
Re:Facebook blocks sharing of critical Guardian article
by tmalsburg2 on Friday September 28, 2018 @07:54PM
(#18097919)
The evidence at hand casts doubt on the idea that the algorithm is very intelligent.