Re:The ‘Real You’ Is a Myth
by bitexploder on Thursday September 27, 2018 @07:38AM
(#18083535)
Personality is not behavior. I think we are just conflating those somewhat.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Interesting ... personality strongly mediates behaviour. How else would you "measure" personality? A strict behaviorist (in the line of Watson or Skinner) would say personality doesn't matter or even exist. It's like the life of a subatomic particle - you only know of its effect but what actually goes on in there is forever a mystery.
Unless you want to go psychodynamic on things but you'll have to start making excuses for Freud then!
Re:The ‘Real You’ Is a Myth
by bitexploder on Thursday September 27, 2018 @07:49AM
(#18083581)
I guess what I am proposing is not really testable. If behavior is the evidence of personality, maybe personality is always just a back-filled hand wavy explanation to describe the behavioral trends. I guess the reason I think that: there is evidence of that subatomic particle (personality) but it is very elusive.
> personality is always just a back-filled hand wavy explanation
This is what Watson would have said (in a roundabout way) [0]. Perhaps it's not related but he's not considered to have been a very nice guy. [1] [2]
Skinner was a lot more fun.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Watson#Behaviorism
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Watson#"Little_Albert"...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Watson#Advertising
Re:The ‘Real You’ Is a Myth
by bitexploder on Thursday September 27, 2018 @08:06AM
(#18083676)
Thanks for sharing — I am not very well read on psychology so I probably operate in ignorance a lot. Never enough time to read and learn everything I wish I could.