News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mmm, Pi-hole by ryandrake on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @10:11AM (#18076093)
Not on a network-wide basis, and not on non-browsers. I don’t think anyone here is saying don’t use a browser-based blocker too. I use both a browser plugin on the client and dnsmasq on my network.
Re:Mmm, Pi-hole by jack12 on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @12:27PM (#18077600)
I think the blog post is saying that, especially in the quote that started this thread. The post portrays ad-blocking browser extensions as not worth the risk, discussing both the questionable value of blocking all ads and also the possible risk of the extension being sold to a malware creator. It then presents Pi-hole as a safe alternative to browser-based blockers.
Re:Mmm, Pi-hole by gruez on Wednesday September 26, 2018 @12:39PM (#18077727)
when i said

>you could do the same with ublock

that was in response to

>This should just be dnsmasq, for which source code is readily available and inspectable. You can (and should) compile it yourself if you don’t trust someone else’s binary.