Ask HN: What are the early signs of the company in trouble?
Has any of your detected early signs of trouble at your company and were able to move out to better opportunities before shit hit the fan ? What were the earlier signs , what would you look for ?
Over 6 months ago, our "C" team was shaken up. Since then almost all execs have been let go or left. No layoffs have been announced and no big news have come up. Current execs are saying not worry about anything, this is a public company.
The reason I dont want to jump the gun too quickly is because great internal projects are starting up and its a good opportunity for me to grow here.
Thanks
(
15 comments
| 42 points
| on HN
)
So cash is king - follow the signs of cash flow.
#1 - watch the sales staff. Their comp is a direct reflection of the company's cash flow. They will leave if the source is running dry and they don't need inside information to figure it out.
#2 - hiring freeze. Classic bad sign. This is a little different than reaching hiring targets - if there is no backfill for attrition though, its a flashing red light.
#3 - travel freeze. Often the first lever pulled by the operations team - its a tell there are cash problems.
C level shakeups are not great indicators. Could be a real problem, but it could also just be powerplay fallout.
The most voted (and accepted) answer has this:
"Sudden VP and director-level resignations. (C-Levels usually ride the ship down.)"
Which is not what you are experiencing, right?
Some practical things from the answer that I find interesting:
"Accounting staff re-arranging their offices to keep workstation displays hidden."
and
"Office consumables (pens, paper, coffee, etc.) inventory not being replaced."
anecdote: I'm aware of a public financial company that roughly did this a few years ago, followed amongst other things by restructuring - making everyone reapply for a job, possibly changing role, possibly taking a voluntary redundancy payout (at least a few people wanted to stay but it would have been a silly financial decision not to take the payout). also followed by a greater emphasis on attempting to modernize IT & internal development capability.
so I wouldn't necessarily attempt to generalise too much from the observation of the C suite churning. Might depend on why the previous exec team churned. Did they lose the support of some powerful stakeholders? Were they a bit complacent and self serving?
No doubt there are other examples where the C suite churning was a prelude to a mess
Oh, and investors will sue public companies if they don't get accurate info, whereas you probably have an arbitration agreement making that unlikely. So check what the company is telling investors, since it's public.
It doesn't hurt to look at other jobs. You can always circle back around to any interested companies if things at your current company doesn't seem right.
What company is it? If it's a public company you are not really revealing your identity by revealing the company.
I'm being a little flippant, but also a little serious. Sometimes you get credible warnings. Sometimes it just comes out of the blue, because it's in management's best interest to keep any impending issues very quiet.
It's good to be looking for these things, but in my experience as soon as your spidey sense goes off, you should have an eye on what's next.
* No pride in what they develop or ship. A despondent attitude towards product
These are all symptoms of something seriously wrong at the top mgmt and in the marketability of the product. As long as this is not addressed, there is no way the company is gonna survive.
That's the best answer to your question