News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Content Is King (1996) by dredmorbius on Sunday September 23, 2018 @12:44PM (#18051871)
And it's only one of multiple myths in this piece. Creators don't need to be paid for their work, but to live. This is a crucial difference.

They may be additionally compensated for having created something (or contributing to the creation of something in a collective effort), but it's that stretch between conception and emergence that is most critical, and for which the market, as it stands, has no answer. And cannot have an answer.

Re:Content Is King (1996) by stuartgm on Sunday September 23, 2018 @12:57PM (#18051943)
So universal basic income?
Re:Content Is King (1996) by anoncoward111 on Sunday September 23, 2018 @01:18PM (#18052051)
Not quite. UBI is millions of people subsidizing everyone.

This is more like 300 fanatical content consumers deciding to give a certain person $5 a month so that they spend as much time as possible producing content.

Re:Content Is King (1996) by dredmorbius on Sunday September 23, 2018 @01:44PM (#18052173)
Present global ad spend is on the order of $600 billion, distributed very roughly across the 1 billion wealthiest inhabitants of the world, or approximately the inhabitants of wealthy industrial nations. This works out to roughly $100 per person per year, or about $8.33/mo.

Allocating this as a tax would more than replace all present spending on authors, screenwriters, journalists, and musicians.

Re:Content Is King (1996) by Tomte on Sunday September 23, 2018 @01:35PM (#18052129)
Re:Content Is King (1996) by dredmorbius on Sunday September 23, 2018 @01:38PM (#18052148)
Quite probably something similar to this, yes.