Re:Deep learning experiments in OCaml
by ChrisRackauckas on Sunday September 23, 2018 @04:13PM
(#18052915)
Right here we have a classic case of someone on the internet anonymously saying something is impossible to do while there are many many examples of exactly this working. I recommend readers of these posts to ignore the FUD and do some Google searches to look through some Julia code repositories to see it in action. There are some great tutorials and fact-based discussions out there that can lead you to some useful examples with tricks you can employ in your own code.
Re:Deep learning experiments in OCaml
by mlthoughts2018 on Sunday September 23, 2018 @08:15PM
(#18054120)
It looks like you are just posting knee-jerk defensive posts about julia I guess. Whatever this is, it’s clearly not related to my earlier comments in the thread.
What are you talking about? Where did I say any of this was not possible? It’s obviously possible.
It just turns out to be bad when you do it. It causes problems that the company line memo about zero overhead never is upfront about.
The “but it requires zero lines of code” thing is so misleading once you hit real use cases where the choices of how the abstraction auto-generates things end up being unusable for some specific situation.