Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by bambataa on Saturday September 22, 2018 @02:42AM
(#18044836)
Well yes, but environmentalists usually also call for large reductions in energy consumption as they know renewables can’t provide a like-for-like replacement. Are the consumers of electricity not also to a degree complicit by creating the demand in the first place? I think it helps to look past the proximate cause.
Presumably the same environmentalists are also backing the exit from coal. Using nuclear instead would have just displaced this mining activity (for the uranium) to somewhere else in the world.
But yeah, Merkel’s nuclear shift did seem pretty rash.
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by detaro on Saturday September 22, 2018 @08:40AM
(#18045754)
It's funny how people associate that nuclear shift with Merkel, given how it mostly was Merkel flip-flopping away from her prior policy of overriding the existing agreements about phasing out nuclear once it started to look bad...
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by ashelmire on Saturday September 22, 2018 @08:32AM
(#18045739)
Which environmentalist groups are anti-nuclear? I've never heard that position from groups in the US.
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by 08-15 on Saturday September 22, 2018 @09:14AM
(#18045844)
Bund für Umwelt- und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND, "association for the protection of environment and nature, Germany"), Greenpeace, Union of Concerned Scientists, Sierra Club, to name just a few.
I'm not placing the blame at the feet of environmentalists, so much as ruing unintended consequences.