Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by CydeWeys on Friday September 21, 2018 @06:14PM
(#18043062)
Sounds like it's time for Germany to invest some money into energy storage solutions rather than relying on coal-burning plants to take up the slack when solar and wind are slacking.
This applies equally so to most nations, of course.
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by 08-15 on Saturday September 22, 2018 @04:52PM
(#18047929)
I'm tempted to argue that storage makes renewables more expensive, but that argument would rest on the assumption that it was even possible to buy storage capacity at a scale of multiple terawatt-hours.
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by oh_sigh on Friday September 21, 2018 @06:16PM
(#18043078)
Solar wind and hydro only provide 25% of Germany's energy needs.
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by CydeWeys on Friday September 21, 2018 @07:08PM
(#18043352)
That figure is out of date -- looks like it was 33% last year and climbing. Source: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-energy-c...
All told coal accounted for 37% last year. So if the trends continue (and it seems like they will), then renewables will eclipse coal by around the end of this year.
Build more solar and wind and add more energy storage to get you through the lagging periods and no more coal capacity will need to be added to the grid, nor new coal mines dug.
Re:After Five Years of Living in Trees, a Protest Community ...
by yjftsjthsd-h on Friday September 21, 2018 @10:56PM
(#18044196)
It's still not currently obsolete, then. More like, "hopefully obsolete soon".
RWE (the big bad evil company who wants to cut down Hambach) would like to shut down a few old and unprofitable coal burning plants. They are forbidden from doing so, because these plants "are essential to the grid". Doesn't sound obsolete to me.