Problem is, the "system" you would "design" to replace capitalism would include charming attributes like exit visas and quite possibly conclude that the "people" would be better off if 10% of them were liquidated for the benefit of the others.

you're just putting words in my mouth now.

>Problem is, the "system" you would "design" to replace capitalism would include charming attributes like exit visas and quite possibly conclude that the "people" would be better off if 10% of them were liquidated for the benefit of the others.

If you're just going to debate a strawman instead of the actual poster and their actual comment, why bother showing up?

Hmm. Left-wing politics is about liberalism and equality, yes? I believe what you meant was as a radical progressive, which is more focused on reforming and improving society.

That liberalism is associated with progressivism seems to take away from progressive right-wingers which may believe in the inherent inequality of certain inevitable social structures, but work to abolish or reform broken regulation.

I do not intend to imply my political beliefs here. I'm simply saying perhaps you meant progressive.

> Left-wing politics is about liberalism and equality, yes?

No. Not in either of the sensed “liberalism” is currently used. Equality, yes, in a manner particularly opposed to the structural inequities of capitalism, but not liberalism, which is either about capitalism or a viewpoint which seeks to maintain capitalism a while moderating certain inequities within it, depending on which of th current usages of “liberalism” you refer to.

> I believe what you meant was as a radical progressive

“Radical progressive” is a phrase used in US politics go refer to a certain range of left-wing positions.

> That liberalism is associated with progressivism

It's not, though one of the senses of liberalism is adjacent to progressivism.

> seems to take away from progressive right-wingers

While the term “progressive right-wingers” may not be nonsensical in some historical usages of “progressive”, it is simply oxymoronic in the current usage.

> which may believe in the inherent inequality of certain inevitable social structures, but work to abolish or reform broken regulation.

You seem to be using “progressive” as simply anyone who seeks change from the status quo to realize their political values, which is a novel use.

The grandparent used “radical leftist” correctly.

I was actually going straight off the wiki definitions.

> I was actually going straight off the wiki definitions.

Asssuming the wiki you are referring to is Wikipedia, you seem to have paid attention only to the first sentence of each article.