News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I simulated California housing and learned about simulators by istjohn on Tuesday September 18, 2018 @09:51PM (#18021023)
> The point here is that we have no idea how to make a school good, other than by kicking out bad students

I would disagree with any metric claiming to measure school quality that is not constant when the demographics of the school change. If our metrics simply gauge the socioeconomic status of a school's population, we need better metrics. We also need to develop interventions that overcome the educational costs of poverty, perhaps, dare I say, by eliminating--or at least attenuating--poverty.

Re:I simulated California housing and learned about simulators by rmdashrfroot on Wednesday September 19, 2018 @08:52AM (#18023791)
Who are you arguing with? You don't like poverty? Neither does anyone else.

And if the metrics don't appeal to your preconceived notion of how the metrics should work, you want to change the metrics? You want metrics to not notice changes in demographics?