Re:Nextspace – NeXTSTEP-like desktop environment for Linux
by teekert on Monday September 17, 2018 @07:43AM
(#18004927)
Oh, 10.6 was so nice, my MBP came with it, it flew, it was fast on 4 GB of ram! Now, the latest MacOS is slow on 16GB of ram, it's the same machine and I still do the same things with it. I don't understand "progress".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nextspace – NeXTSTEP-like desktop environment for Linux
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Monday September 17, 2018 @10:08AM
(#18006030)
For comparison, Windows 2000 has a recommended minimum requirement of 64MB of ram. Windows 95 recommended 8MB. That's the scale of bloat we're talking about. That a modern UI which does essentially the same things can feel unresponsive in any way on several orders of magnitude more resources says a lot about the priorities of modern software developers.
Re:Nextspace – NeXTSTEP-like desktop environment for Linux
by jen20 on Monday September 17, 2018 @12:09PM
(#18007204)
Windows 95 to Windows 2000 is not a fair comparison, but Windows NT 4.0 is - which required 16MB and recommended 32MB.
Re:Nextspace – NeXTSTEP-like desktop environment for Linux
by phendrenad2 on Monday September 17, 2018 @12:49PM
(#18007576)
I don’t think they were comparing 2000 to 95, but both if them to modern OSs (in some sense 8MB vs 64MB is such a small difference compared to modern OSs which basically need 8GB minimum)
Re:Nextspace – NeXTSTEP-like desktop environment for Linux
by lukifer on Monday September 17, 2018 @09:23AM
(#18005684)
The more computing resources we make available, the more wasteful we become: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox