Re:U.S. $23 trillion will be lost if temperatures rise four ...
by pmontra on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @02:19PM
(#17962062)
Sadly it could be $230 trillion but people alive in 2100 are not voting in elections in 2018 and too few people are caring now about what will be going on after they're dead.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. $23 trillion will be lost if temperatures rise four ...
by devoply on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @03:06PM
(#17962369)
We need to focus on building a civilization that lasts millions of years. Currently we're focusing on building a civilization that could go extinct at any given time.
Re:U.S. $23 trillion will be lost if temperatures rise four ...
by rmah on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @05:23PM
(#17963487)
Why? This is a serious question, not an snarky quip. Why should we try to build a civilization that lasts a very very long time (i.e. thousands of years)?
Re:U.S. $23 trillion will be lost if temperatures rise four ...
by gg5ever on Tuesday September 11, 2018 @06:42PM
(#17964060)
I think that's a tough question. Here's how I justify it to myself, and I think most people share these values. You can tell they share them because they don't want to die or suffer.
If you grant that conscious existence has value, then the continued existence of the human race is worthwhile.
If you grant that life has value, then preventing the destruction of eath's environment is worthwhile.
If you don't value those things, it's difficult to make a compelling argument. However, I would argue that consciousness matters because it's the only thing that can create "meaning" to existence. And life matters because it's the only thing (we know of) that produces consciousness.