Re:Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns
by s0rce on Monday September 10, 2018 @09:31PM
(#17956540)
Piedmont Nextdoor is similar. Bunch of people with no background in RF health effects or non-ionizing radiation tissue interaction arguing pointlessly with conspiracy theory website as supporting evidence. Seeing a few scientists (in other fields) try to respond is exasperating. I don't bother.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns
by photos_victim on Monday September 10, 2018 @09:35PM
(#17956555)
Whole Bay Area, I guess. Remember, the city of Richmond (California) passed a resolution against orbiting mind-control satellites. It’s juat wacky around here.
Re:Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns
by s0rce on Monday September 10, 2018 @09:39PM
(#17956577)
I particularly like the Nuclear free zone signs in Berkeley.
Re:Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns
by curun1r on Monday September 10, 2018 @10:43PM
(#17956824)
That wasn't about resident safety, it was about a moral position against war. IIRC, those went up in the 80s when residents wanted to ensure that Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory couldn't legally do the kind of weapons-directed research that Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory did.
Re:Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns
by hodgesrm on Monday September 10, 2018 @10:05PM
(#17956686)
On the other hand there has not been a single nuclear explosion within city limits since those signs went up.
Re:Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns
by jwhitlark on Monday September 10, 2018 @10:14PM
(#17956716)
Well, at least that's dangerous.