News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fitbit's 150B hours of heart data by TeMPOraL on Thursday September 06, 2018 @03:40AM (#17924546)
> Unhealthy people pay more (kinda fair don't you think?)

Depends. You can be unhealthy through no fault of your own (genetics, environment). From social utility POV, insurance is about pooling risk. Taking your scenario to the limit, if insurance company is able to compute an accurate risk factor for everyone and adjust premiums accordingly, then the risk pool evaporates. But then again, maybe health insurance shouldn't really be a private industry.

Re:Fitbit's 150B hours of heart data by scotty79 on Thursday September 06, 2018 @09:30AM (#17926073)
Insurance still works even if insurer knows exactly how probable is given outcome and how much exactly will it cost and adjusts the fee to that. People don't insure themselves because it's a good deal. They do it because they know they won't be able to survive financial burden of some rare event that most likely won't happen but they need to be sure that in the case it happens they'll be covered. And they are willling to pay for that.

Risk is still pooled because payouts come from fees of the people that didn't (and won't) experience costly events themselves.

More information just makes the business more just and less random for insurer.