News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc... by klmr on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @10:22AM (#17909225)
Many researchers at the moment happily pay APCs (=Open Access article processing charges) in the several thousands of dollars — this is way more than is required as a minimal cost of editing. In fact, you can easily hire a freelance editor to work on your paper for less. If the process becomes minimally streamlined it could be made very affordable: at the moment, a lot of the work of a journal editor is (intentionally, as well as due to inertia) due to the utter lack of streamlining.
Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc... by semi-extrinsic on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @04:45PM (#17912629)
I'm not surprised if their actual costs are in the range of thousands of dollars, because they typically have horrible typesetting workflows that take your nice LaTeX, mangle it into QuarkXPress and give you a PDF for proofreading with tens or hundreds of annoying small errors. Which you have to find and point out, and then they fix every single one manually in their horrible software.

It's not the cost of a value-adding service, but the cost of having a huge technical debt that nobody has bothered paying down on.

Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc... by bryanrasmussen on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @10:27AM (#17909262)
thanks, didn't know that.