Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc...
by yreg on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @09:41AM
(#17908936)
From my limited experience math/comp-sci paper drafts tend to be available for free. Totally not the case for e.g. neurology sadly.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc...
by psychometry on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @09:45AM
(#17908963)
Yes, the papers themselves are usually easy to find for free. The code and data, though, not so much.
Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc...
by notsofastbuddy on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @09:59AM
(#17909047)
This seems orthogonal to the topic under discussion though. I don't believe GP was saying the publications are perfect.
Re:Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subsc...
by psychometry on Tuesday September 04, 2018 @04:52PM
(#17912684)
No, but codifying access requirements might be the right opportunity to require code/data sharing. After all, some research is next to useless without it and the public paid for the code as much as the paper.