News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:San Francisco Denies Scooter Permits for Bird, Lime, Uber... by Someone on Friday August 31, 2018 @05:57AM (#17884257)
”We'd like to put scooters everywhere, is that cool?”

That would have gotten a no, but ”we would like to do an experiment decreasing road congestion” could have gotten them a yes _and_ a subsidy for running the experiment.

And yes, that “yes” would have had strings attached, even if it weren’t subsidized, but that’s normal for anthingmyhea affects shared space. If a company goes to the city and says “we would like to park our cars on the street instead of on our expensive parking lot” or “we would like to semi-permanently occupy the space in front of or shops”, would you expect the city to say “yes”, too?

Re:San Francisco Denies Scooter Permits for Bird, Lime, Uber... by nojvek on Friday August 31, 2018 @10:30AM (#17885870)
Yeah but an experiment wouldn’t have gotten them those fat VC dollars.

Fat VC dollars come when they think you’ll dominate the world of scooters and put them everywhere. If you spend some of those millions fighting city governments so be it. Bribe them, make them fail elections, find loopholes, extend court trials forever. This companies have almost an unlimited supply of money.