News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by stormbrew on Thursday August 30, 2018 @11:50AM (#17877671)
The real scourge at the time was actually pop-unders, which you would never figure out where they came from and saw them potentially hours after visiting the site that produced them.

It's honestly an improvement that sites have to obscure their own content (and thus spite their nose to save their face) and nothing else in order to give you intrusive ads. You'll always know what websites don't put value on their own content that way.

Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by rasz on Thursday August 30, 2018 @01:13PM (#17878526)
What do you mean was? popunders are all the rage recently and work great under Chrome.

[Reverse Engineering new PopUnder for Chrome 63 on Windows] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcFQeimLH1c

https://www.reddit.com/r/LiveOverflow/comments/84ertx/new_po...

Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by stormbrew on Thursday August 30, 2018 @06:07PM (#17881239)
Eh, it's kind of different when they're literally exploiting something in new versions of browsers that are actively updated and are going to get fixed.

Back then it was just supported behaviour and the dominant browser went several years without a major update. Like night and day.

Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by Dylan16807 on Thursday August 30, 2018 @01:38PM (#17878800)
Heck, popups still work in Chrome if they clickjack. There's no way to entirely disable popups on a site.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by tomxor on Thursday August 30, 2018 @03:14PM (#17879817)
Chrome provides many content settings that tend to toggle between "disabled, ask, allow". It should be possible to provide an option for spawning windows even when originating from a user event (although there isn't one currently).
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by brennebeck on Saturday September 01, 2018 @10:56PM (#17895264)
Are you saying to have a permission that would ‘disallow, ask, or allow’ me opening new tabs? Because that’s exactly what it sounds like to me.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by garmaine on Thursday August 30, 2018 @03:13PM (#17879805)
The browser could just not make any new window as a result of a click in the content area.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by askmike on Friday August 31, 2018 @12:31AM (#17882968)
Browsers implement the HTML spec, which allows for this behavior.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by adrianN on Friday August 31, 2018 @01:29AM (#17883180)
Browsers have been known to implement the spec only partially.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by garmaine on Friday August 31, 2018 @01:34AM (#17883194)
They’re not required to.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by feross on Saturday September 01, 2018 @05:28PM (#17893958)
Indeed. Have you seen my site https://theannoyingsite.com/ ?
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by hollerith on Thursday August 30, 2018 @04:14PM (#17880313)
Your https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcFQeimLH1c is a 4.5-hour video, the first 5 minutes of which shows a completely static video track with an audio track of a guy talking slowly.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by rasz on Thursday August 30, 2018 @08:42PM (#17882074)
welcome to reverse engineering
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by tomxor on Thursday August 30, 2018 @03:09PM (#17879771)
The funny thing with these under a tiling window manager, is they turn into pop-sideways-es :D (unless you are in a stacking mode), makes it a bit easier to kill them immediately and also makes it more obvious where they came from. Haven't come across these in a while now though.
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by mcdevilkiller on Friday August 31, 2018 @08:21AM (#17884890)
i3wm?
Re:Changing Our Approach to Anti-Tracking by tomxor on Saturday September 01, 2018 @02:57AM (#17890641)
yes :)