This seems like an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence, especially since the notion of wear out is only applicable to SSDs (as shorthand for write endurance).
I certainly believe that mechanical disks, with all those moving parts, can have their failure rates increased by increased use, but it's not safe to assume even something as high as a linearly proportional relationship, considering which parts move when.
I'm not sure if you meant to imply that ZFS is different from standard RAID in this regard, but it doesn't seem as though it is.
Is ZFS scrubbing different than the other RAIDs' (scheduled or schedulable) reads of the entire array, other than nomenclature?
> scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h36m with 0 errors on Sun Aug 12 06:00:50 2018
I don't see any cron jobs though...
But in addition to this, standard Raid5 does not periodically read the data, so it's actually rather common for issues to only arise on a resilver.
This is why proper maintenance in ZFS is to run ZFS Scrub (basically check every file) once a week.