Re:IncludeOS – A minimal, resource efficient unikernel for c...
by kuwze on Sunday August 26, 2018 @09:49PM
(#17848945)
Jails, maybe. Zones, definitely not.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IncludeOS – A minimal, resource efficient unikernel for c...
by elcritch on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @02:43AM
(#17856971)
Zones are much more developed than jails, but not quite as flexible as lxc.
Re:IncludeOS – A minimal, resource efficient unikernel for c...
by kuwze on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @11:04AM
(#17859324)
I did not know that, I thought lxc was behind zones in terms of features/flexibility.
Re:IncludeOS – A minimal, resource efficient unikernel for c...
by elcritch on Tuesday August 28, 2018 @01:18PM
(#17860683)
From what I understand, Linux let’s you configure independent namespaces for network, disk, CPI, etc separately. Though sure entirely what lxc allows you to configure. Whereas zones have a more one-to-one mapping of namespaces so it’s easier to secure. Just what I picked up from using Joynet’s Triton system. I really enjoyed the zones interface on smartos, decent JSON api and cli tools, built from the ground up on ZFS datasets. Jails are terrible in comparison by not really having a good standard api interface, imho.