Re:WireGuard VPN review: A new type of VPN offers serious ad...
by Freaky on Sunday August 26, 2018 @10:03PM
(#17849012)
New deployments should be with 1.1 using its new protocol.
https://www.tinc-vpn.org/documentation-1.1/Simple-Peer_002dt...
Re:WireGuard VPN review: A new type of VPN offers serious ad...
by galadran on Monday August 27, 2018 @02:20AM
(#17849768)
That does look a lot better, however:
a) its not supported by the stable release
b) There are no claims about downgrade resistance. The manual specifies the new transport protocol is used if both clients support it and both have changed their configs to enable experimental mode. Can an attacker still force them to connect with legacy mode?
c) Users have to ensure every single config on every client has the correct setting.
d) It still doesn't have the identity hiding features of Wireguard. (Someone observing your network traffic can see which servers you are talking to from the transmitted signatures)
Re:WireGuard VPN review: A new type of VPN offers serious ad...
by Freaky on Monday August 27, 2018 @10:43AM
(#17851772)
You can disable legacy support by not generating any RSA keys, or by building with DISABLE_LEGACY.
Re:WireGuard VPN review: A new type of VPN offers serious ad...
by xmichael999 on Sunday August 26, 2018 @10:16PM
(#17849052)
Huh, interesting... I am definitely going to be doing some reading about this one. I wonder what the logic of the project maintainers, whom seem to maintain it, have in keeping with this method of encryption.
https://www.tinc-vpn.org/documentation/Security.html#Securit...
The default cipher is from 1993 and its creator recommends everyone updates.
32 bit MACs are hilariously tiny.
Home rolled authentication based around RSA.
Their own documentation even states: ”tinc’s security is not as strong as TLS or IPsec."
DO NOT USE tinc!