Re:Intel Publishes Microcode Patches, No Benchmarking or Com...
by wtallis on Thursday August 23, 2018 @01:08AM
(#17824755)
If we tech journalists were actually seriously concerned that Intel would be dumb enough to try to enforce those provisions against us, then we'd just ask the motherboard vendors for updated pre-release firmware that incorporates the new microcode but doesn't come with Intel's license agreement attached. We often go that route anyways because it's easier to update the motherboard than to ensure that every OS you're testing against (especially Windows) has loaded the newer microcode.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel Publishes Microcode Patches, No Benchmarking or Com...
by lagadu on Thursday August 23, 2018 @03:51AM
(#17825387)
Also if you get the update via windows update you get the patch without having ever agreed to the no-benchmarking clause, so you're free to publish anyway.
Re:Intel Publishes Microcode Patches, No Benchmarking or Com...
by glenneroo on Thursday August 23, 2018 @06:51AM
(#17826130)
Windows Updates used to pop up an EULA to be agreed upon before installing certain anti-malware related software, not sure if that's the case anymore with Windows 10 auto-install-and-reboot procedure. I wonder if Intel could/would try to have Microsoft insert another click-to-agree EULA for this upcoming patch?
Re:Intel Publishes Microcode Patches, No Benchmarking or Com...
by rebelwebmaster on Thursday August 23, 2018 @09:32AM
(#17827086)
I got the Win10 update yesterday and didn't have to accept any sort of license first.
Re:Intel Publishes Microcode Patches, No Benchmarking or Com...
by HelloNurse on Thursday August 23, 2018 @09:34AM
(#17827107)
It's easier, you can post bar graphs where Intel processors are listed as "presumably very bad". Just to remind the public that they should expect the worst because Intel has something to hide.