News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Listen to Her: Gender on This American Life (2017) by rectang on Tuesday August 21, 2018 @10:18PM (#17815747)
It seems like you're using "interesting" as an absolute metric, which I think is highly dubious for an aesthetic quality.

Another explanation is that interviewing people in positions of authority is unavoidable and those people are disproportionately male at present. But the point of this article is that they looked at the data and it didn't reveal what they expected.

Re:Listen to Her: Gender on This American Life (2017) by spacehome on Tuesday August 21, 2018 @10:42PM (#17815848)
I didn't really mean to use the word that way. I mean more in the sense of "serving This American Life's storytelling goals". The best of their programs are very thought-provoking, and I'll end up thinking about them long after the show is over. I don't think I could articulate what TAL's goals are exactly, but I do find some of them "interesting", and that's what I hope for when I tune in.

I meant the word to encompass a lot of different qualities. For instance if a story is told better with a first hand account of an authority, then that authority is of interest to the story, and hence that authority is interesting (as he or she relates to the story).