Re:Stacking concrete blocks is a surprisingly efficient way ...
by mrtksn on Sunday August 19, 2018 @08:28AM
(#17794021)
Maybe the materials can't withstand such extreme forces? After all, the same logic would apply to any system that stores mechanical energy.
Can you, for example, make a mechanical watch by compressing liquid instead of a spring?
Re:Stacking concrete blocks is a surprisingly efficient way ...
by PeterisP on Sunday August 19, 2018 @12:39PM
(#17794963)
The obvious answer is expense; the motor-generator part is the expensive part of the system (both in building and in maintenance) so you don't want a larger motor if a smaller will do, and you don't want more motors if fewer one will do.
For such a system, time isn't precious, hardware is.
Or why doesn't it just have many medium motors; each permanently attached to a single medium-sized block? Why should the relationships between motors and blocks be one-to-many?
Lots of small concrete blocks, a camera and a hook to latch onto them one at a time sounds overly complicated and error-prone - Not to mention how much precious time would be wasted getting the hook through the holes and then coordinating the lifting so that each block ends up stacked nicely.