News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stacking concrete blocks is a surprisingly efficient way ... by coolso on Sunday August 19, 2018 @01:35AM (#17792776)
> Concretely (pun not intended), I found a document [2] saying

That's definitely a really awkward choice of word in that context for it not to be intended, so I'm thinking pun was, in fact, intended. You can try to convince me otherwise but in order to do so I'll need to see some concrete evidence (pun not intended)

Re:Stacking concrete blocks is a surprisingly efficient way ... by bakhy on Sunday August 19, 2018 @09:25AM (#17794206)
"Pun not intended" should definitely be among the top 10 most common lies, along with the likes of "I'm starting tomorrow", or "I'll pay you back" ;)
Re:Stacking concrete blocks is a surprisingly efficient way ... by saulrh on Sunday August 19, 2018 @03:29AM (#17793049)
Not sure why you're being downvoted, it's a fair question. Maybe your post reads a bit abrasively? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Anyway, I really didn't intend the pun! My reaction to the article was to try to get a rough estimate of how reliable tower cranes are, at which point I realized that they must be very reliable to work at all. But I only had that broad hypothesis of "very reliable", so I went looking for evidence to confirm it, and if so, what that broad hypothesis ended up looking like in practice. For whatever reason I found "concretely" when I went looking for a word for the segue. Probably concrete on the brain and a bit of luck.

Re:Stacking concrete blocks is a surprisingly efficient way ... by morog on Sunday August 19, 2018 @03:13AM (#17793007)
Not sure why the downvotes, I thought the exact same thing