News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dear Academia, I loved you, but I’m leaving you (2014) by analog31 on Saturday August 18, 2018 @08:19PM (#17791690)
So, build two more LHC's. ;-)

In my view it should be a judgment call whether a particular result needs to be replicated. I'm aware of the so called replication crisis. But adding more arbitrary rules will simply invite people to figure out how to game those rules, if they were gaming the original rules (deliberately or unwittingly).

Re:Dear Academia, I loved you, but I’m leaving you (2014) by v_lisivka on Sunday August 19, 2018 @04:24AM (#17793236)
LHC is not the first collider in the world, so results from previous experiments are used to calibrate LHC.
Re:Dear Academia, I loved you, but I’m leaving you (2014) by analog31 on Sunday August 19, 2018 @07:25AM (#17793814)
Yes, this seems like a much less wasteful, and possibly more fruitful approach. Rather than running identical experiments, one can perform experiments that test different but overlapping aspects of the underlying theory. I suspect this kind of "replication" is done all the time in physics, which has led to a robust knowledge base in spite of less than ideal rigor within any individual experiment.