Re:How Women Came to Dominate Neuroendocrinology
by jbob2000 on Friday August 17, 2018 @02:20PM
(#17784728)
Or perhaps your different perspective convinced him to stop work on what would have been an amazing development?
I'm just responding to your anecdote and I do agree that different perspectives are valuable. My point above was just that there are many, many places to include diversity and the hyper-focus on the implementation phase (aka development) means you will miss the more valuable lifecycle phases where diversity has much more impact.
Re:How Women Came to Dominate Neuroendocrinology
by whatshisface on Friday August 17, 2018 @07:11PM
(#17786014)
This would seem to support the claim that none of the perspectives that would matter to an engineer are gender-specific.
I went and talked to the customers and other stakeholders, and found out that 300 hours was actually a nice-to-have. 48 hours with some margin was absolutely necessary, and 100 hours was better than equivalent devices on the market. We got buy-in to change the requirements and released the next week with a 100 hour lifetime.
Just an idea what a different perspective can bring.